NAWA Racer · the honest report

186 in town,
and 93 on the road.

A French cafe-racer concept built to prove an ultracapacitor-plus-battery hybrid, not to be sold. The city range claim is real for a clever reason; the highway number is roughly half of it. We decode why, with the physics and the sources.

Start with what matters
The 10-second answer

A serious chemistry idea wearing a beautiful concept body. The NAWACap ultracapacitor genuinely grabs 80 to 90 percent of braking energy, which is why the city figure is so high. Plan for ~93 mi on a steady road run (not 186), a claimed ~100 hp and sub-3-second 0 to 62 mph, and remember: it is a prototype with no price and not street-legal as a concept.

Range
186 mi urban claimed
0mi steady highway
−50% off the road
Power
~100 hp headline
0kW claimed (concept)
design target
Top speed
>100 mph claimed
0mph, concept figure
unverified prototype
Price
no MSRP
$0not for sale
tech demonstrator
Range reality · straight-line
claim 186 mi urban, real on the road:
0mi
−50% vs. the city claim
NAWA Racer · steady mixed / highway run
Start city, or drag the pin
Claimed (urban)Real (highway)
Rings are straight-line distance from your pin; real routes are shorter still. The 186 mi figure depends on heavy stop-and-go regen the open road cannot provide. All figures are concept claims, not validated production tests.
What it really costs

There is no
price tag.

$0to a buyer · it is a concept, not a product
The NAWA Racer was shown at CES 2020 as a technology demonstrator. There is no showroom, no MSRP, and no consumer running costs to itemize, so a full 5-year cost-to-own breakdown does not exist and we will not invent one. The standing cost methodology still appears below for reference.

Why no cost table: a prototype has no price, warranty, or dealer. Per our factual-only rule we leave the cost figures blank rather than fabricate them. What we can cost honestly is the energy itself, shown in the charging module below.

The full report

Every module behind the headlines: what it is, the range claim in context, the NAWACap idea, the physics, and the standard scorecard. All sourced.

The 10-second honest answer

The NAWA Racer is a technology demonstrator from Aix-en-Provence nanotech firm NAWA Technologies, shown at CES 2020. Its job is to prove a small NAWACap ultracapacitor paired with a modest 9 kWh battery can transform city range, the ultracapacitor grabs 80 to 90 percent of braking energy almost instantly. Plan for ~93 real highway miles (not 186), and treat the rest of the spec sheet as a design target, because it is a prototype, not a product you can buy.

A

Is this bike for me?

Start here. The honest answer is that nobody can buy it yet, so the question is who it is relevant to.

01

Who it is actually for

A concept is judged differently from a product. We still lead with audience so nobody waits on a showroom that does not exist.

🔬EV tech watchers

The sweet spot. If you care about where battery technology is heading, the NAWACap ultracapacitor hybrid is a genuinely substantive idea worth following, and the Racer is its showcase.

Verdict, worth your attention
🛒Buyers wanting one now

There is nothing to buy. The Racer is a prototype shown at CES 2020 to demonstrate the chemistry, with no production version, price, or order page.

Verdict, not a product
🎞️Design and styling fans

The carbon-fibre cafe-racer body and hubless wheels are striking. Enjoy them as a concept; just know the hubless wheels are a show-stand flourish, not a validated production solution.

Verdict, admire from a distance
🛥Commuters

The concept's whole pitch is city riding, where the ultracapacitor shines. But it is a prototype, not street-legal as shown, so it cannot actually be your commuter today.

Verdict, the right idea, not yet a bike
02

At a glance: claimed vs. real

Same concept, two stories. The struck-through line is the headline NAWA leads with; the big number is the steadier figure NAWA itself also gives. The "why" is in Part C.

Range
186 mi urban claimed
0mi highway
−50%
Power
~100 hp headline
0kW concept
design target
Weight
quarter lighter, claimed
0lb (~150 kg)
carbon frame
Price
no MSRP
$0not for sale
concept
B

Innovations

What is genuinely clever, and which "innovations" are really show-car flourishes. The part a glossy concept reveal never tells you.

03

What makes it special

One idea here is genuinely substantive and one is mostly for the show stand. Each badge tells you which is which.

NAWACap ultracapacitor + lithium hybrid

A 0.1 kWh NAWACap ultracapacitor paired with a 9 kWh battery. It can grab 80 to 90 percent of braking energy almost instantly, far more than a battery alone can absorb, and hand it straight back. In stop-and-go riding that recovery is what roughly doubles the usable city range. This is the genuine engineering edge.

★ Genuine edge
🧰Carbon-fibre frame, ~150 kg

A carbon-fibre frame and composite panels bring claimed weight down to about 150 kg (331 lb), which NAWA frames as roughly a quarter lighter than a comparable electric sportbike. A real lever for both range and acceleration, if it survives production.

✓ Solid
🔌Fast partial top-ups

NAWA cites the ultracapacitor recharging in about two minutes and the battery reaching 80 percent in roughly an hour from a home supply. The ultracapacitor's instant absorb-and-release is the real story; the battery charge figure is a concept claim.

✓ Solid
🀺Hubless front and rear wheels

The hubless wheels look spectacular and do real work for the show stand, but they are an unproven, show-car flourish rather than a validated production solution. Admire them from a distance.

⚠ Oversold
Why this beats a glossy reveal: a concept page presents every feature as equally finished. We tell you the NAWACap hybrid is the real, substantive idea, the carbon frame is a solid lever, and the hubless wheels are styling, so you know which part of this concept actually deserves to reach production.
C

Keeping them honest

Concept specs vs. the physics. The math is simple, battery capacity and a few formulas, so let us run it on the numbers NAWA published.

04

The "~100 hp" headline, decoded

Concept power figures are design targets, not dyno results. Convert to the unit everyone feels and keep the caveat in mind.

NAWA quotes around 99 hp (about 74 kW) for the Racer, with 0 to 100 km/h pitched comfortably under three seconds and a top speed beyond 100 mph. Convert watts to horsepower:

# Horsepower = Watts ÷ 746
Concept output:  74000 W ÷ 746 = 99 hp  (matches NAWA's ~100 hp figure)
NAWA Racer (claimed)
~99 hp · 74 kW
Typical city e-moto
~20 hp
Why peak vs. continuous matters here: on a prototype, neither figure has been independently sustained on a dyno. Treat 99 hp as the design target. The light ~150 kg claimed weight is what would make even a modest sustained output feel quick.
05

Where "186 miles" comes from

The headline gap, and the most interesting number on the page. The city claim is not a trick; it depends on a kind of riding the highway cannot provide. Here is the arithmetic.

Step 1, real energy in the tank. NAWA states a 9 kWh battery plus a 0.1 kWh ultracapacitor. The published figures are in kWh, not a V and Ah split, so we use the kWh directly rather than invent a split.

# Energy = battery + ultracapacitor
9.0 kWh + 0.1 kWh = ~9.1 kWh nominal
# Cannot safely use 100%. BMS reserve + taper ≈ 88% usable:
9,100 Wh × 0.88 = ~8,000 Wh usable

Step 2, the ultracapacitor changes the math. NAWA cites about 300 km (186 mi) urban and roughly 150 km (93 mi) on a steadier mixed or highway run. The reason the city number is so high is regen: the tiny ultracapacitor can absorb 80 to 90 percent of braking energy almost instantly and return it, where a battery alone manages far less. In stop-and-go riding that recovery roughly doubles the usable range.

# Range = how the energy is used, not just how much there is

URBAN (heavy regen via NAWACap):
~300 km (186 mi)  ← the headline city figure

HIGHWAY (steady speed, little braking to recover):
~150 km (93 mi)  # regen has little to grab at constant speed
Urban (claimed)
186 mi
Highway (NAWA's own)
~93 mi
The takeaway: the 186 mi figure is honest about what it is, a stop-and-go city number where the ultracapacitor does its best work. On the open road, where steady cruising leaves little braking energy to recover, NAWA's own figure roughly halves to ~93 mi. Plan around the road number.
06

Why the city number does not survive the highway

~100 mph claimed top speed and a 186 mi city range cannot both describe the same ride. As with any EV, hold a steady high speed and the regen advantage disappears.

The NAWACap's superpower is capturing the energy of braking. A motorway cruise involves almost no braking, so the ultracapacitor has little to harvest, and consumption is driven instead by aerodynamic drag, which rises with the square of speed. That is precisely why NAWA's own highway figure is half the city one.

# Drag, and lack of regen, set the highway figure
Urban: frequent braking → ultracapacitor recovers 80–90%
Highway: steady speed → little to recover, drag dominates
Result: 186 mi city, ~93 mi highway  # one or the other, never both
The honest read: the ultracapacitor is a genuine city advantage and a weaker highway one. That is not a flaw NAWA is hiding, they publish both numbers, but it is the context the 186 mi headline alone never gives you.
07

Charging: read the claim, mind the prototype caveat

Charge time is just battery size divided by charger power. NAWA gives a charge claim; we run it against our own formula and flag what is and is not published.

NAWA states the ultracapacitor recharges in about two minutes and the battery reaches 80 percent in roughly an hour from a home supply. The stock charger wattage is not published, so we work backward from the claim to show what it implies.

# Charge time (hr) ≈ Battery Wh ÷ Charger W × 1.1 (losses + taper)
To reach 80% (~7,300 Wh) in ~1 hr implies roughly: ~8,000 W charger
# i.e. a strong home/fast supply, not a trickle charger
Full 9.1 kWh at that rate: 9,100 ÷ 8000 × 1.1 = ~1.3 hr (concept claim)
The ultracapacitor's near-instant absorb-and-release is the genuinely novel charging story; the battery's "80% in an hour" is a concept claim with no published charger wattage to verify it. We surface the implied figure for context and label it as a claim, not a tested result.
D

What it costs

Nothing yet, because it is a concept. Here is the honest non-answer, plus the one cost we can compute.

09

True cost to own

A full 5-year cost-to-own breakdown for this model does not exist, because there is no price, dealer, or warranty to itemize.

The NAWA Racer is a demonstrator. NAWA Technologies' actual business is selling the ultracapacitor technology, not the bike. So there is no MSRP and no consumer running costs to total. The one figure we can compute honestly is the cost of the energy itself, below.

Line itemTypicalNotes
Purchase pricenot for saleConcept; never listed at any price
Registration / insurancenot applicablePrototype, not street-legal as shown
Electricity (per full charge)~$1.36Math below; the only honest cost line
Realistic cost to ownno figureWe leave this blank by policy
# The one cost we can honestly compute, the energy
9.1 kWh × 1.12 loss = ~10.2 kWh per full charge
10.2 × $0.17/kWh = ~$1.74 per charge  # US average rate
$1.74 ÷ 93 mi = ~1.9¢ / highway mile
Our policy: we report the energy cost because we have the inputs, and we leave the rest blank because we do not. A concept with no price gets no fabricated cost table.
E

Living with it

You cannot live with a concept. What we can responsibly say about reliability and support.

11

Service, reliability and support

There is no owner base to survey, so we do not invent owner themes. Here is the honest framing.

✓ What is genuinely promising

  • The NAWACap ultracapacitor idea is substantive and backed by a real nanotechnology company.
  • The hybrid concept addresses a real EV weakness: capturing heavy regen a battery alone cannot absorb.
  • A light carbon-fibre structure would, if productionized, reduce wear and stress on components.

✕ What you cannot rely on

  • No production version, so no long-term reliability or durability data exists.
  • No dealer, warranty, or service network of any kind.
  • The hubless wheels and several show-car features are unvalidated for daily use.
Our read: the chemistry deserves to be taken seriously; the bike is a demonstrator. We score reliability and support low not because the engineering is poor, but because there is no production product or ownership data behind it.
⚠ Street-legal status As a concept shown at CES 2020, the NAWA Racer is a prototype, not a homologated, street-legal production motorcycle. None of the concept figures should be read as a validated, road-legal product.
12

Parts & aftermarket availability

A concept has no aftermarket. This section exists for parity with our other reports.

There is no consumer parts supply for the NAWA Racer, because there is no production bike. The valuable, ownable thing here is the NAWACap ultracapacitor technology itself, which NAWA Technologies aims to license into other vehicles, not a catalog of bike spares.

Part categoryAvailabilityRough cost
OEM consumer partsnonenot sold
Battery / ultracapacitor sparesnoneno production bike
Aftermarket supportnoneno platform
F

The verdict

One scorecard, identical axes on every bike, even a concept.

13

The standard scorecard

Every model on the site is scored on the same eight axes. The Racer scores low on the ownership axes, because as a concept it does not offer ownership, while the idea behind it is genuinely strong.

Value for money
grin per dollar
0
Real-world range
vs. claim
0
Reliability
core mechanicals
0
Support & warranty
dealer-dependent
0
Parts & aftermarket
availability
0
Cost to own
5-yr, higher=cheaper
0
Street-legal ease
as shipped
0
Family-friendliness
new / young riders
0
Bottom line: judged as a product, the Racer scores low, because it is not one yet. Judged as a glimpse of where battery technology could go, the NAWACap ultracapacitor hybrid is the part worth taking seriously. Enjoy the bike as a demonstrator, watch the chemistry, and do not wait by a showroom door.

The math toolkit

Our standing methodology, run identically on every e-moto, including concepts we would otherwise have reason to flatter.

5 formulas, every bike
1Real energy in the battery
Energy (Wh) = Voltage (V) × Capacity (Ah)

NAWA publishes 9 kWh + 0.1 kWh ultracapacitor, not a V and Ah split, so we use the kWh directly rather than invent one.

2Usable energy
Usable Wh ≈ Nominal Wh × 0.85–0.90

You never use 0 to 100%. The BMS holds a reserve and voltage tapers at the bottom. We assume ~88%.

3Real range
Range (mi) = Usable Wh ÷ Consumption (Wh/mi)

Here regen is the lever: the ultracapacitor's city recovery is exactly why 186 mi urban halves to ~93 mi on the highway.

4Power you can feel
hp = Watts ÷ 746  |  Continuous = cruise · Peak = launch

74 kW ÷ 746 ≈ 99 hp, matching NAWA's figure. On a concept, treat it as a design target.

5Charge time
Time (hr) ≈ Battery Wh ÷ Charger W × 1.1

No stock charger wattage is published, so we work backward from NAWA's "80% in an hour" claim and label it as such.

Cost assumptionWe usedChange it if…
Annual mileage1,500 mi/yr (7,500 / 5 yr)Not applicable to a non-production concept
Electricity rate$0.17 / kWh (US avg)Your utility differs
Sales tax~8%No sale, no tax
Battery lifeNo replacement in 5 yrNo ownership period exists
Resale~60% of MSRP at yr 5No MSRP and not for sale

Sources & references

✓ Every figure on this page traces to a source below

We cite everything and date it. The NAWA Racer is a concept, so all of its specs are manufacturer claims and design targets, not validated production tests. Where a figure does not exist, we say so rather than guess. Spot an error? Our corrections policy means we fix it in public.

Specs, range & the hybrid system
Charging & the NAWACap

Sources retrieved May 2026. All NAWA Racer figures are concept claims and design targets, not independent production tests. There is no consumer price for this prototype, and we decline to invent one.